teach/learn cap for guildskills

[Amy]

Could we get teach/learn capped for guild skills at rank 36 unless a person actually learning the skill belongs to the guild? I figure circumventing joining a guild and still being able to learn skills past the guild skill cap of rank 36 defeats the purpose of having guild skills at all.

[Dice]

It's pretty hard to find somebody who will actually teach you above 36 when you're not in the guild. I don't think this tends to be a problem, in any practical sense. You literally have to get EVERY rank above 36 via teaching, no LBu possible.

[Leech]

I'm generally for realism in all things, so I don't really like this, but I see the point. However, doesn't the lack of a cap provide more RP? I.E. fighting for control over your guild's knowledge and trades.

[wimple]

I feel like this is in direct response to the writ thing. If you're worried about this, raise the price of writs or restrict them. I don't think it's applicable across the board for all guilds.

People can't learn through use for those skills already, so there is a steep handicap. Further, if you find out who in your guild is teaching them, they can have IC consequences for it. Should just be dealt with IC.

[Kinaed]

Alas, no. We left the 'get a guild person to teach you' caveat out on purpose. Sorry!